The concept of “quiet quitting” essentially describes employees doing the bare minimum required of their job description and no more. They’re not going above and beyond, staying late, or taking on extra responsibilities. Essentially, they’re mentally checking out while physically remaining employed.

This trend has emerged in the wake of the Great Resignation, where record numbers of employees left their jobs seeking better pay, work-life balance, and overall satisfaction. Many argue that “quiet quitting” is a direct result of burnout, toxic work cultures, and a lack of appreciation from employers.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

While the phrase “quiet quitting” may seem like a catchy label, it oversimplifies a complex issue. Is it truly about doing the bare minimum, or is it a form of self-preservation by setting healthy boundaries?

Let’s analyze the two sides:

• Quiet Quitting: This implies a level of disengagement and apathy towards one’s job. It suggests a lack of motivation and desire to contribute beyond the minimum requirement. This can negatively impact team morale and productivity.
• Setting Boundaries: This involves consciously defining limits to protect one’s time, energy, and well-being. It’s about prioritizing personal life and refusing to let work consume every aspect of existence. This can lead to a healthier work-life balance and increased productivity within set hours.