Despite its name, “quiet quitting” isn’t about actually quitting your job. Instead, it’s about setting clear boundaries by sticking to your job description and resisting the pressure to go above and beyond. This means not volunteering for extra projects, clocking out on time, and politely declining tasks outside your defined responsibilities.

This trend gained momentum after the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted a widespread reevaluation of work-life balance and priorities. Many employees, facing burnout and feeling undervalued, began questioning the expectation of constant overperformance. “Quiet quitting” emerged as a way to reclaim their time and energy, establishing a firmer line between work and personal life.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Understanding the Difference

While “quiet quitting” might sound like a passive-aggressive act, it’s crucial to distinguish between disengagement and healthy boundary-setting. While disengagement can harm both the individual and the organization, setting boundaries is essential for well-being and sustainable productivity.

Here’s a closer look at the key differences:

• Quiet Quitting: Often marked by apathy, resentment, or lack of motivation. It involves doing the bare minimum, avoiding responsibility, and mentally checking out of work.
• Setting Boundaries: A proactive approach to managing your time, energy, and workload. It involves communicating your limits clearly, prioritizing your well-being, and focusing on delivering quality work within agreed-upon parameters.