Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Why the Latest Work Trend Sparks Debate





The Rise of Quiet Quitting

The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking countless articles, social media debates, and even think pieces from industry leaders. But what exactly does it mean? Is it simply a new buzzword for an age-old phenomenon, or does it signify a deeper shift in the employee-employer relationship?

Understanding the Quiet Quitting Context

The concept of “quiet quitting” refers to employees doing the bare minimum at work—meeting their job requirements but not going above and beyond. They’re not actively seeking new employment, but they’re also not emotionally invested in their current roles. This disengagement can manifest as:

  • Sticking strictly to job descriptions and not taking on extra tasks.
  • Leaving work promptly at the end of the workday and not engaging in overtime.
  • Limiting their participation in meetings and company events.
  • Showing a general lack of enthusiasm or initiative.

While the term may be new, the sentiment behind it isn’t. Employees have long struggled with burnout, feeling undervalued, and lacking a sense of purpose in their work. However, the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of remote work have undoubtedly amplified these issues, leading to a reassessment of priorities and a renewed focus on work-life balance.