Introduction
The modern workplace buzzes with a new phrase: “quiet quitting.” This seemingly contradictory term has sparked countless debates, articles, and think pieces, reflecting a growing tension between employees and their employers. But is “quiet quitting” truly a new phenomenon, or is it simply a rebranding of an age-old concept: setting boundaries?
Understanding the Changing Work Landscape
The rise of remote work, the gig economy, and the ever-increasing demands of a hyper-connected world have blurred the lines between our professional and personal lives. Employees are expected to be “always on,” readily available to answer emails and jump on calls, often at the expense of their personal time and well-being. This constant pressure cooker environment has led many to feel burnt out, undervalued, and disillusioned.
Enter “quiet quitting” – a term that encapsulates the decision to do the bare minimum at work. No more going above and beyond, no more burning the midnight oil, and no more sacrificing personal time for the sake of the company. While some see this as a form of workplace apathy, others argue that it’s a necessary act of self-preservation in a work culture that often prioritizes profit over people.
