The phrase itself is somewhat misleading. “Quiet quitting” doesn’t necessarily involve quitting your job at all. Instead, it refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. No more going above and beyond, no more burning the midnight oil, and definitely no more sacrificing personal time for the sake of the company.

This trend emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which triggered a widespread reevaluation of work-life balance. Employees, having experienced remote work and greater flexibility, began questioning the traditional expectations of the workplace. The result? A desire for more defined boundaries and a refusal to subscribe to the “hustle culture” that often leads to burnout.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Understanding the Difference

While the term “quiet quitting” has a negative connotation, implying a lack of work ethic, the reality is often more nuanced. Many individuals engaging in this so-called “trend” are simply prioritizing their well-being and establishing healthier work-life boundaries.

Here’s a breakdown of the key differences:

• Quiet Quitting: Often characterized by disengagement, apathy, and a decline in work quality. It can stem from feeling undervalued, burnt out, or simply lacking motivation.
• Setting Boundaries: Involves clearly defining limits between work and personal life to prevent burnout and prioritize well-being. This can include setting specific work hours, not checking emails after hours, and taking regular breaks.