The term ‘quiet quitting‘ exploded in popularity in 2022, capturing the zeitgeist of a post-pandemic world where work-life balance felt increasingly elusive. Several factors contributed to this phenomenon:

• Burnout: The pandemic exacerbated existing work-life balance struggles, leading to increased stress and burnout for many.
• The Great Resignation: Witnessing colleagues leave for greener pastures prompted many to re-evaluate their own priorities and relationship with work.
• Hustle Culture Backlash: A growing sentiment emerged, particularly among younger generations, against the glorification of overworking and the pressure to constantly go above and beyond.

Quiet Quitting vs. Boundary Setting: What’s the Difference?

The heart of the debate lies in the interpretation of ‘quiet quitting’. Some argue it’s a misnomer, equating it to simply setting healthy boundaries. They argue that:

1. Employees are still fulfilling their job descriptions: ‘Quiet quitters’ aren’t necessarily slacking off. They’re simply choosing not to engage in activities outside their defined roles and responsibilities.
2. Prioritizing well-being: By setting boundaries, individuals prioritize their mental and physical health, leading to potentially better work-life balance and increased productivity during work hours.
3. Redefining success: ‘Quiet quitting’ challenges the notion that professional success should come at the expense of personal well-being.

However, critics argue that ‘quiet quitting’ can be detrimental, claiming:

1. It can foster a negative work environment: When employees disengage, it can impact team morale and collaboration.
2. It can hinder career progression: Going above and beyond is often seen as essential for promotions and raises.
3. It can be misconstrued as apathy: While setting boundaries is healthy, disengagement can be perceived as a lack of interest or commitment.