Posted in Trending

Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Navigating the Changing Work Ethic

Author user Estimated read time 3 min read

Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Navigating the Changing Work Ethic

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”

The term “quiet quitting” is making waves in the workplace. But is it really a new trend, or just a new name for an old struggle? This concept, sparking debates and articles galore, revolves around employees doing the bare minimum at work, rejecting the pressure to go above and beyond.

work. Remote work blurred the lines between personal and professional life, often resulting in longer hours and burnout. Simultaneously, movements championing work-life balance and mental health gained traction. It’s no wonder employees, especially younger generations, are questioning the expectation of constant overexertion.

However, it’s vital to distinguish between “quiet quitting” as disengagement and “quiet quitting” as establishing healthy boundaries.

Unpacking the Nuances: Disengagement vs. Boundaries

While some use “quiet quitting” to describe passive resistance stemming from frustration or disillusionment, this behavior often reflects a desire for a healthier work-life balance.

Let’s break it down:

  • Disengagement: Marked by apathy, negativity, and declining work quality, harming both the individual and the organization.
  • Setting Boundaries: Involves clearly defining work hours, prioritizing well-being, and declining tasks outside one’s job description. This proactive approach fosters a sustainable and fulfilling work experience.

Related