The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: Disengagement or Self-Preservation?
The modern workplace is buzzing with whispers of “quiet quitting.” This seemingly new phenomenon has ignited passionate discussions about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the very nature of a job. But is it truly a new wave of silent rebellion, or are we simply witnessing the evolution of setting boundaries?
Decoding the Trend: What Exactly is “Quiet Quitting“?
“Quiet quitting” isn’t about actually quitting your job, at least not in the traditional sense. It’s about mentally checking out while physically staying put. Instead of going above and beyond, “quiet quitters” stick to the strictly defined boundaries of their job description. They work their designated hours, fulfill their assigned tasks, and then clock out – mentally and often physically.
This trend emerged in the wake of the Great Resignation, a period marked by record numbers of employees leaving their jobs. Many attribute the rise of “quiet quitting” to burnout, lack of work-life balance, and a desire for greater autonomy and control over one’s time and energy.
